Interim Report, Table of Contents Start of this Section Previous Page Next Page Next Section Civil Justice Reform - Interim Report About CJR Citator



N2. Training

712. Critics of Lord Woolf's reforms, such as Professor Zander, have expressed concern as to the width of judicial discretion arising under the CPR. They argue that this inevitably makes for inconsistency among judicial determinations, leading to injustices very difficult to cure on appeal. They are undoubtedly right to point to such dangers. If reforms are to gain acceptance, it is crucially important that a high quality of judicial decision-making, exhibiting an intelligent application of the discretionary principles, be attained: Proposal 78.
713. This means that serious training programmes must be set up for judges, masters and court administrative staff to acquire an understanding of the reforms and to hone the skills needed to administer them. As Lord Woolf pointed out :-
"The new system of case management will involve new responsibilities, a new ethos and new skills for all members of the judiciary. It will require greater expertise in the handling of civil cases including case management skills. The new skills will require enhanced training. It will rely on team work and liaison between different levels of judges. It will require a new approach to the deployment of judges to ensure a greater element of continuity and consistency."(Note 608)
714. As with the deployment of resources, the content of training programmes should also be sensitive to and directed at the needs of any procedural reforms adopted. To take a few instances :-
* The summary assessment of costs demands a degree of consistency and may benefit from judicial conferences along the lines of sentencing conferences as part of a training programme. Regular newsletters might be circulated indicating the level of summary assessments made.
* If court-annexed mediation were to be adopted, judges would require training to help them identify those cases which may and those unlikely to benefit by a reference to such mediation (or some other form of ADR).
* With the increasing number of litigants in person, judges should be made aware of any measures designed to assist them and also receive training in how to deal sensitively and effectively with such litigants in the course of hearings. Administrative staff will require training on how to assist and deal with litigants in person at the Registry counter, on the telephone, and so forth.
* In so far as information technology is harnessed to civil justice system reforms (see below), the training of judges and all relevant court personnel in the use of such IT systems will be essential.
715 Again, an analysis of any adopted reforms is required to identify specific areas where judges and court officials are likely to profit from training.

 

Notes

608 WIR, p 23 ยง15.  <back>


Previous Page Back to Top Next Page
Web Accessibility Conformance