Interim Report, Table of Contents Start of this Section Previous Page Next Page Next Section Civil Justice Reform - Interim Report About CJR Citator



K5. Pleadings and statements of truth

K5.1. The problems with pleadings

284. As Lord Woolf noted, pleadings, intended as a procedural tool to promote fair and efficient litigation, have become subverted from their proper purpose :-
"Whether through incompetence or deliberation, pleadings often fail to state the facts as the rules require. This leads to a fundamental deficiency, namely the failure to establish the issues in the case at a reasonably early stage, from which many problems result." (Note 220)
285. Some of the particular defects with the present practice of pleadings were identified as follows :-
"* They often fail to set out the facts clearly and so impede identification of the issues;
* they concentrate too much on causes of action and defences, rather than on facts, which in turn contributes to over-use of alternative positions; defences in particular are deliberately framed to keep all options open for as long as possible;
* affirmative defences are not pleaded;
* longwindedness; and
* the original pleadings get out of date as they are superseded by amendments and further and better particulars; after the exchange of witness statements, they become less relevant for the purpose of the trial agenda." (Note 221)
286. Similar difficulties have been reported in Australia, with a couple of additional points :-
"* Inexact pleading and frequent amendment of pleadings is allowed by courts and there is no incentive for respondents to define the issues too closely as they are entitled to put the applicant to proof on each matter pleaded
* 'Such ease [in amending pleadings] permits and indeed encourages inexact pleadings; an applicant is aware that pleadings can be developed, reformulated and "tidied up" in due course, and as a consequence less care and less specificity than would otherwise be the case ensues.'
* lawyers frequently use pleadings in counter-productive ways: for example, by failing to admit matters pleaded that they know from their instructions to be true or making allegations that they cannot prove at trial." (Note 222)
287. Experience indicates that all of these deficiencies are frequently encountered in relation to pleadings filed in this jurisdiction and that improvements are clearly called for.

 

Notes

220 WIR p 8, §8.   <back>
221 WIR p 153, §4.   <back>
222 GTC, p 96-97, citing ALRC No 62,  §10.89 et seq.  <back>


Previous Page Back to Top Next Page
Web Accessibility Conformance