 |  |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|  | |  | |
All those who responded on Proposal 69 were in favour of such simplification
and
suitably adapted, retaining the present terminology, for defining the scope of judicial
review proceedings in Hong Kong.
Recommendation 144: Rules along the lines of CPR 54.1 to 54.3, suitably
adapted, retaining the present terminology, should be adopted for defining the
scope of judicial review proceedings in Hong Kong.
Notes
Those responding in favour included the Bar Association, the DOJ, the APAA, the Hon Ms Margaret
Ng, one set of barristers' chambers, two firms of solicitors and two individual respondents. The Law
Society stated that it did not consider this Proposal (or any of the other proposals concerning judicial
review).
|
 |
|