 | |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| | |
| Item No. | Recommendations | Rules Affected | Amendment Rules | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| 56. | Recommendation 83 When disposing of interlocutory applications after the summons for directions, the court should normally make orders which specify the automatic consequences of non-compliance appropriate and proportionate to the non-compliance in question. Orders specifying such consequences may, if appropriate, also be made where the interlocutory application is heard before the summons for directions. However, the directions given on the summons for directions itself should generally not specify any such consequences. |
RHC Order 32 |
Rules 106-107 | ||||
| 57. | Recommendation 85 All interlocutory applications (other than time summonses and applications for relief against the implementation of sanctions imposed by self-executing orders previously made) should be placed before the master who may either to determine the application on the papers and without a hearing or to fix the summons for hearing either directly before a judge in chambers or before a master. |
||||||
| 58. | Recommendation 86 Rules and practice directions should be issued, in respect of the setting of the timetable and the filing of evidence, skeleton arguments and costs statements to enable the master to exercise his discretion as aforesaid. |
||||||
|
 |
|
